Richard Goldstone Changes His Mind

“We know a lot more today about what happened in the Gaza war of 2008-09 than we did when I chaired the fact-finding mission appointed by the U.N. Human Rights Council that produced what has come to be known as the Goldstone Report. If I had known then what I know now, the Goldstone Report would have been a different document.”  [emphasis added]

So wrote Richard Goldstone in an April 1st Op-Ed column published in The Washington Post.

Writing in The Jerusalem Post, David Horovitz stated that Goldstone’s column “represents nothing less than an apology to Israel.” 

He added:  “How tragic, that is, that Goldstone so misplaced his moral compass in the first place as to have produced a report that has caused such irreversible damage to Israel’s good name. Tragic least of all for the utterly discredited Goldstone himself, and most of all for our unfairly besmirched armed forces and the country they were putting their lives on the line to honorably defend against a ruthless, murderous, terrorist government in Gaza.”

Despite Goldstone’s retraction, Horovitz points out that the damage to Israel has been done: 

“Nor either, pitifully, will the media organizations that so hyped the baseless allegations of Israeli war crimes now allocate similar broadcast-topping coverage and front page space to Goldstone’s belated exoneration of Israel. It will be a surprise, indeed, if we see the world’s most resonant newspapers following Goldstone’s lead and penning texts acknowledging that their reports and their analyses and their expert opinion pieces were wide of the mark.”

The expression “teachable moment” comes to mind.  Perhaps there will be important lessons learned next time.  Perhaps.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Hamas, Israel Media Coverage, Israel Self-Defense, Op-Ed/Blog/Opinion/Commentary, Support for Israel, United Nations and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.